Analysing the books in the series, we estimate that the reading level of Calling Bullshit: The Art of Scepticism in a Data-Driven World is 11th and 12th grade.
Readability Test | Reading Level |
---|---|
Flesch Kincaid Scale | Grade 8 |
SMOG Index | Grade 11 |
Coleman Liau Index | Grade 11 |
Dale Chall Readability Score | Grade 7 |
The estimated word count of Calling Bullshit: The Art of Scepticism in a Data-Driven World is 95,635 words.
A person reading at the average speed of 250 words/min, will finish the book in 6 hrs 23 mins. At a slower speed of 150 words/min, they will finish it in 10 hrs 38 mins. At a faster speed of 450 words/min, they will finish it in 3 hrs 33 mins.
Calling Bullshit: The Art of Scepticism in a Data-Driven World - 95,635 words | ||
---|---|---|
Reading Speed | Time to Read | |
Slow | 150 words/min | 10 hrs 38 mins |
Average | 250 words/min | 6 hrs 23 mins |
Fast | 450 words/min | 3 hrs 33 mins |
for Calling Bullshit: The Art of Scepticism in a Data-Driven World
Bullshit isn’t what it used to be. Now, two science professors give us the tools to dismantle misinformation and think clearly in a world of fake news and bad data. Misinformation, disinformation, and fake news abound and it’s increasingly difficult to know what’s true. Our media environment has become hyperpartisan. Science is conducted by press release. Startup culture elevates bullshit to high art. We are fairly well equipped to spot the sort of old-school bullshit that is based in fancy rhetoric and weasel words, but most of us don’t feel qualified to challenge the avalanche of new-school bullshit presented in the language of math, science, or statistics. In Calling Bullshit, Professors Carl Bergstrom and Jevin West give us a set of powerful tools to cut through the most intimidating data. You don’t need a lot of technical expertise to call out problems with data. Are the numbers or results too good or too dramatic to be true? Is the claim comparing like with like? Is it confirming your personal bias? Drawing on a deep well of expertise in statistics and computational biology, Bergstrom and West exuberantly unpack examples of selection bias and muddled data visualization, distinguish between correlation and causation, and examine the susceptibility of science to modern bullshit. We have always needed people who call bullshit when necessary, whether within a circle of friends, a community of scholars, or the citizenry of a nation. Now that bullshit has evolved, we need to relearn the art of skepticism.